Heaven by default?

When christians are sleeping beauties, going to heaven without sinning is not a big achievement really.

...not 'sinning' because of lost rewards, or punishment of burning pits, is certainly quite a primitive response, almost pavlovian....

...pursuit of morality and ethics for the beauty and purity of it, for the reason that one wants to actually prevent society, individuals, oneself from harm, seems rather the far more honest way...

...questioning laws, and having the balls to reject them when they lack logic, they harm others and oneself, and taking the responsibility upon oneself for having made the decision to go this way, seems the far more courageous way....

...making the decision to take on ethical standpoints, and laws that make sense right away, rather than waiting for death to answer all one's unanswered questions, too, seems far more real, far less 'sleeping beauty-like...

Comments

Paul said…
Welcome back to blogging...

Can a motivation like loss of potential reward or avoidance of punishment be Pavlovian? Isn't the essence of Pavlovian conditioning that it uses repeated stimulus to teach lessons? What (if anything) comes after death can hardly be repeated as a learning experience -- unless you believe in reincarnation, which kind of presupposes that heaven and hell are not relevant.

On the other hand, fear or reward may not be as good a reason for Christianity as attraction to some of its more positive aspects -- purpose to life, opportunity to help others, love for God -- or even the positive reasons you give for pursuit of morality and ethics.

You can debate how many Christians fall into each camp ("primitive" or "honest") - but is it always possible to judge from the outside? Fortunately, I don't think that is my responsibility.

Questioning harmful rules (or interpretations of rules) is good - but not always easy. It can be uncomfortable to challenge ones own assumptions, and unpopular to challenge those of the powerful - in any subculture.

Sometimes we make too many kind assumptions about those who see things as we do - or too many unkind ones about those whose views we find distasteful. Challenging that (even realising it) can be even harder.

Even though we will surely never know all the answers - in this life at least - it does seem cowardly to wait until the next life to look for answers, or see wrongs righted.

But is the unexamined life really the sole prerogative of the twice born?

Popular posts from this blog

Sunday distractions at Colpetty Methodist Church

What's happiness?

Enduring Word Commentary on Romans 1